Robert Hanssen found guilty of spying for the Soviet Union and Russia
- May 10: Former FBI agent Robert Hanssen is found guilty of spying for the USSR and Russia. Hanssen spied for the USSR, and later Russia, for a 15-year period, and apparently decided to be a Soviet mole even before joining the FBI. In 1979 he outed General Dmitri Fedorovich Polyakov as an American spy; during his time as a Soviet spy, he outed numerous other American sources, and revealed to the Soviets an extensive tunnel dug under the Soviet embassy for purposes of eavesdropping. Hanssen was a key source in the FBI for the Reagan-era spying on American peace organizations and other liberal groups, and took part in the Reagan administration's orchestrated harassment of such groups. Hanssen was also the source for a 1997 Robert Novak column accusing then-Attorney General Janet Reno of covering up 1996 campaign finance improprieties. Hanssen, a member of the conservative Catholic organization Opus Dei and a fan of Internet pornography, pleads guilty to avoid the death penalty, and is sentenced to life in prison. (Wikipedia)
- May 13: Afghanistan is ready to close a deal for construction of the $2 billion gas pipeline to run from Turkmenistan to Pakistan and India. The BBC article states, "work on the project will start after an agreement is expected to be struck" at a summit scheduled for the end of the month. Unocal will build the pipeline. (BBC/From the Wilderness)
- May 13: Bush signs a huge ($190 billion) farm subsidy bill that protects farmers from the vagaries of the free market and especially protects large corporate farmers, who will receive approximately 80% of the subsidies. Journalist Paul Waldman writes, "One of the things the farm bill showed is that while Republican officeholders pose as small-government fiscal conservatives, in fact they are just as friendly towards government as Democrats -- as long as government benefits them and their agenda." (CNN, Paul Waldman)
- May 14: After an extensive review of the US's sanctions against Iraq, the United Nations decides to revamp its own sanctions, allowing more civilian goods into the country while further restraining military and dual-use material. The new "smart sanctions" pushed for by the Bush administration supposedly can be dropped at any time if Saddam Hussein will accept UN demands for a renewal of UN inspections of weapons production plants. Unfortunately, as US officials later acknowledge, the American plan is to make so many demands of Hussein that he will refuse to comply; for example, the US demand for Hussein to open up all of his palaces to inspection is virtually meaningless in a military sense, but is calculated to give maximum offense to Hussein. The strategy works. Hussein resists pleas from European countries such as France to let the UN perform their inspections and "not give the United States an excuse to bomb." The driving reason behind this, of course, is money -- as Seymour Hersh writes, "some of the most ardent advocates of the war against Iraq were also the most eager to profit from it." (FactMonster, Seymour Hersh)
- May 16: White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer states that while President Bush had been warned of possible hijackings, "The president did not -- not -- receive information about the use of airplanes as missiles by suicide bombers." And National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice tells the press, "The overwhelming bulk of the evidence was that this was an attack that was likely to take place overseas." Rice is one of the few administration officials to have read the August 6, 2001 Presidential Daily Briefing entitled, "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US." (CBS/From the Wilderness, Asia Times)
- May 17: When asked about what intelligence warnings the Bush administration may have had before 9/11, Vice President Dick Cheney says, "What I want to say to my Democratic friends in the Congress is they need to be very cautious not to seek political advantage by making incendiary suggestions as were made by some today that the White House had advance information that would have prevented the tragic attacks of 9/11. Such commentary is thoroughly irresponsible and totally unworthy of national leaders in a time of war." Democratic Representative Richard Gephardt responds, "We have a duty and a responsibility to keep the American people safe. Obviously that didn't happen on September the 11th. We've got to do better in the future. And with this information, finding out what happened at the CIA, at the FBI, in the White House, maybe we can do a better job in the future." Press secretary Ari Fleischer's response to such questioning is particularly telling: when asked about a widely-circulated report that includes the statement, "[S]uicide bombers belonging to al-Qaida's martyrdom battalion could crash-land in aircraft packed with high explosives into the pentagon, CIA Headquarters, or the White House," Fleischer responds, "This document was described...it is not a piece of intelligence information suggesting that we have information about a specific plan or that they are going to. It describes... the title of report, if I recall, is "the psychology and the sociology of terrorists." The reporter bores in, saying, "This is pre-9/11 material. Nobody, either in the President's CIA briefings or in a principal committee, said, 'you know what? These lunatics have talked about flying planes into buildings.'" Fleischer attempts to shift the blame of not knowing off of the Bush administration and onto the Clinton administration and to Congress by saying, "This report from 1999 about the thinking, the psychology of terrorism, was available in 1999 to members of Congress, the previous administration. It existed in some form, which did not come to the attention of this administration when we took office on January 20." Subseqent investigation proves that Fleischer's statements are flat lies. (PBS)
- May 19: US government sources confirm that Bush was given specific and detailed warnings about the 9/11 attacks on August 6, 2001. In a top-secret intelligence memo headlined 'Bin Laden Determined to Strike in the US', Bush was told that Osama bin Laden hoped to 'bring the fight to America' in retaliation for missile strikes on al-Qaeda camps in Afghanistan in 1998. Bush officials deny that they knew anything other than there was the general possibility of a terrorist attack somewhere, but insist they had no information that the attack or attacks might take place on US soil. Officials admitted four days earlier that Bush was informed that bin Laden wanted to hijack airplanes; administration officials strenuously deny that anyone thought the aircraft hijackings might play a part in such attacks. "It is widely known that we had information that bin Laden wanted to attack the United States or United States interests abroad," says press secretary Ari Fleischer. "The president was also provided information about bin Laden wanting to engage in hijacking in the traditional pre-9/11 sense, not for the use of suicide bombing, not for the use of an airplane as a missile." The memo received by Bush on August 6 contained unconfirmed information passed on by British intelligence in 1998 revealing that al-Qaeda operatives had discussed hijacking a plane to negotiate the release of Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, the Muslim cleric imprisoned in America for his part in a plot to blow up the World Trade Center in 1993. Bush was on vacation at his "ranch" in Crawford on August 6; after the briefing, which reportedly failed to catch his interest, he spent the rest of the afternoon fishing. (Guardian, New York Times/AFPN)
- May 19: On NBC's Meet the Press, one of his favorite venues for spreading disinformation, Vice President Dick Cheney once again makes false, blanket assertions about Iraq's capabilities and possession of WMDs. "We know he's got chemicals and biological [weapons]," Cheney says. "[W]e know he's working on nuclear." Actually, US intelligence knows nothing of the sort, and indications are strong that Hussein has no WMDs whatsoever. When Cheney's claims are later completely disproven, he will deny making any of these claims. (NBC/Bush on Iraq, Frank Rich [PDF file])
- May 19: Cheney says he has advised President Bush not to turn over to Congress the August 2001 intelligence briefing that warned that terrorists were interested in hijacking airplanes. He also insists that the investigation into Sept. 11 should be handled by the Congressional intelligence committees, not an independent commission. "...[T]his administration, as I found in some of my other work in Congress, has a real penchant for secrecy," responded Senator Joseph Lieberman. "I found that in the investigation my committee is doing of Enron, where I think we're asking for some very reasonable information. And the White House has so far stonewalled us." The administration claims that it wants to keep personal conversations and exchanges private; Rep. Henry Waxman points out, "some of these staffers when they worked on the Hill had no concern about asking about the private conversations of President Clinton and his staff or his attorney general and her staff." (CCR)
- May 20: After months of negotiations and political maneuverings, East Timor officially wins its independence from Indonesia. Newly elected president Xanana Gusmao takes office. A UN peacekeeping force remains on the island to protect the fledgling government and the populace from Indonesian depredations. (BBC/East Timor Timeline
)
- May 20-24: The Bush administration issues a remarkable series of terror warnings that many believe are politically motivated. Vice President Cheney warns it is "not a matter of if, but when" al-Qaeda will next attack the US. Homeland Security Director Tom Ridge says the same thing. Defense Secretary Rumsfeld says terrorists will "inevitably" obtain weapons of mass destruction. FBI Director Robert Mueller says more suicide bombings are "inevitable." Mueller and other authorities also issue warnings that al-Qaeda terrorists might target apartment buildings nationwide, banks, rail and transit systems, the Statue of Liberty, and the Brooklyn Bridge, as well as warning of possible attacks by terrorist scuba divers. Donald Rumsfeld piles on, saying that terrorists will "inevitably obtain weapons of mass destruction, probably from Iraq" -- scoring a double by tying Iraq to the terror scares. USA Today titles an article, "Some Question Motives Behind Series of Alerts." David Martin, CBS's national security correspondent, says, "Right now they're putting out all these warnings to change the subject from what was known prior to September 11 to what is known now." Press Secretary Ari Fleischer eventually admits the alerts were issued "as a result of all the controversy that took place last week." Time notes, "Though uncorroborated and vague, the terror alerts were a political godsend for an Administration trying to fend off a bruising bipartisan inquiry into its handling of the terrorist chatter last summer. After the wave of warnings, the Democratic clamor for an investigation into the government's mistakes subsided."
- Columnist and author Frank Rich later writes that the terror alerts were planned to counter the revelations of pre-9/11 failures, including FBI agent Coleen Rowley's May 21 assertion that FBI officials in Washington had prevented her office from investigating accused 9/11 plotter Zacarias Moussaoui, and related stories of blocked FBI investigations in Phoenix and Minneapolis. (See the 9/11 pages of this site for further information.) Cheney tells a fawning Larry King that no one in the White House would ever dream of trying to distract Americans from the news of pre-9/11 governmental ignorance by issuing a raft of bogus terror alerts. But at no time does the Homeland Security terror alert warning system ever rise from yellow to orange. (CCR, Mother Jones, Frank Rich pp.48-9)
- May 21: General Tommy Franks tells reporters that he is unable to answer any questions about any plans to invade Iraq because "my boss has not yet asked me to put together a plan to do that." In reality, Franks and his staff have been working on invasion plans since November 2001. (Mother Jones)
- May 22: Unification Church founder Sun Myung Moon, the owner of the conservative Washington Times, announces that a heavenly meeting was held on Christmas 2001 under the auspices of God himself. In the meeting, attended by Jesus Christ, Muhammed, Confucius, and Buddha, Jesus named Moon as the next Messiah, and all in attendance agreed. Moon makes his announcement during the 20th anniversary gala celebrating the Times, a bash attended by rafts of Republican officials and marked by a message from George H.W. Bush, a longtime Moon supporter, praising the Times as a "distinguished source of information and opinion...a credit to journalism." (New York Times/Paul Waldman)
- May 23: President Bush states his opposition to the creation of a special, independent commission to probe how the government dealt with terror warnings before 9/11. He will later change his stance in the face of overwhelming support for the idea, but then sabotage an agreement that Congress had reached to establish the commission. (CCR)
- May 24: The US and Russia sign the Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty, or SORT, limiting the two countries to the deployment of no more than 2,000 nuclear warheads. Under the START II extension, both countries will soon be limited to a similar number of warheads as well as completely eliminating all delivery systems, but Bush, unbeknownst to Putin, intends to withdraw from START II, a decision he makes in June. (Arms Control Association, Molly Ivins and Lou Dubose)
- May 24: Republican senator Jim Jeffords switches party affiliations to "independent," and announces he will caucus with Senate Democrats, giving control of the Senate to the Democrats. Privately Jeffords, a moderate Republican from Vermont, says he is sick of being "battered and disrespected" by White House officials, whose extremist conservative agenda offends him and who refuse to acknowledge his own more centrist views. Jeffords is immediately smeared as the worst kind of traitor by conservatives in government and the media. Democrats will control the Senate with a 51-49 split until 2002, when Republicans will take back control of the chamber. (Wikipedia, Ron Suskind)
- May 27: Bush arrives in the Senate's Mansfield Room for what is supposed to be a quick, pro forma meeting with Senate Republicans before a ceremony honoring Nancy Reagan in the Capital Rotunda. However, Bush, who is angered by just-released reports that indicate he had general foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks, launches a diatribe that shakes up its listeners. Newsweek's Howard Fineman, who has often written fawning profiles of Bush and his administration, writes that Bush delivers "a jut-jawed, disjointed discourse with a tinge of diatribe and a crescendo of podium pounding." Veering from subject to subject, hands shaking and his ire steadily mounting, Bush saves his most emotional ranting for North Korea's Kim Jong-il. "He's starving his own people!" Bush shouts, and claims that North Korea is imprisoning intellectuals "in a gulag the size of Houston." He calls Kim "a pygmy" and compares him to "a spoiled child at a dinner table." Even his Republican backers are stunned by Bush's near-hysteria. "Nobody dared look at anybody else," says one senator. Bush's anger at North Korea's deliberate starving of its own citizens is laudable but odd, considering that, except for photo ops, he's never shown the slightest iota of interest in any starving people anywhere. If he feels so strongly about North Korea's famine (certainly being used to advantage by Kim, but caused by a variety of factors both environmental and political), then we await his indignant outrage about the famine sweeping through much of Africa. The episode tells us more about Bush and his internal demons than anything else. (Mark Crispin Miller)
- May 27: A request to reclassify US Navy pilot Michael Scott Speicher, shot down in his F-18 Hornet during the first night of the Persian Gulf War on January 17, 1991, as a prisoner of war (POW) instead of missing in action (MIA) is made by Republican Senator Pat Roberts. The request causes tensions between senior Defense Deparment officials, with Undersecretary Douglas Feith opposing the request and Deputy Secretary Paul Wolfowitz countermanding Feith's denial. Democratic Senator Bill Nelson insists on a firsthand exploration of the evidence by an investigative team sent to Iraq (Iraq has issued a standing invitation for any investigators to come and inspect their records and the crash site), saying: "The US military has a creed among pilots that when you have to punch out, you are going to have a rescue team that will come get you. ...Against all odds, they will come, try to find you and get you out alive. This awful question hangs over the Commander Scott Speicher case that we abandoned him." No search-and-rescue missions were ever launched to find Speicher or to determine his fate, and few, if any, questions were even asked about his disappearance. Strong evidence has existed for years that Speicher survived the crash of his plane and was almost immediately captured by Iraqi forces. In 1991, based on preliminary evidence, then-Defense Secretary Dick Cheney declared Speicher to be dead. The DoD decided that Speicher had been shot down by a surface-to-air missile and must have died in the explosion; Speicher's colleague Spock Anderson, who accompanied Speicher on the mission, insisted that Speicher was shot down by an Iraqi MiG fighter plane. Last year the CIA determined that Speicher's plane was indeed shot down by an air-to-air missile, and the decade-old coverup of evidence in the shootdown was first revealed. Mark Crispin Miller, a professor of media studies at New York University who reviewed the shootdown, concludes that the Pentagon "got caught up in a cover-up of his death" while pushing to get Congress to upgrade the F-18 Hornets. "The Pentagon played down that an Iraqi MiG shot down the plane because the F-18 was up for a valuable contract renewal. ...They would not want it out that a MiG shot down that plane." The contract was renewed. Later in the year, Saddam Hussein declared that Speicher was dead and his body "devoured by wolves." Admiral Mike Boorda, then Chief of Naval Operations, signed off on a letter declaring Speicher "killed in action" in May 1991, ending any further inquiries into Speicher's death.
- In 1993, a Qatari hunting party found Speicher's plane in the Iraqi desert, with its engines intact, making it unlikely that the account of Speicher's death in a fiery explosion was true. The hunting party took photographs of the find. The ejection seat and canopy, or the bubble that covers the cockpit, were found intact a mile away. And a pilot's flight suit was found abandoned near the canopy, cut, burned, and bearing small traces of what appeared to be blood. A review of satellite photos by the Pentagon shows Speicher's downed plane and a hand-drawn signal in the sand indicating that Speicher had fled. Pentagon officials decided that Speicher couldn't have survived for long, and did not tell Speicher's family of their discovery. When Speicher was shot down, his wife was told "everything had been done," says family attorney Cindy Lacquidara. "They were continuing to search." In 1991 the family was given this message: "All -- repeat: all -- theater combat search-and-rescue efforts were being mobilized." But in fact "there was no search," Lacquidara says. "They dropped the ball. A number of people did." Pat Roberts observes: "It's outrageous we told her there was a search. We left somebody behind! He has got to be out there wondering when on Earth his country is going to come and get him. I'm not saying there was a cover-up, but there is considerable embarrassment to the government. Our U.S. intelligence analysts showed clearly that he survived the crash. I believe he survived the crash, was hospitalized and taken to prison."
- The Clinton administration began talks with the Iraqis and the International Red Cross to open the crash site to US investigators; the Iraqis finally gave permission for an investigation in December 1995. Early reports from the investigation indicated that no evidence of Speicher's survival had been found, according to Republican Senator Robert Smith. Smith also received reports from the Pentagon's Inspector General and the General Accounting Office, praising the intelligence agencies' role regarding Speicher. Weeks later, Smith began to hear very different information. He soon verified both that there was no search for Speicher when he was shot down in 1991 and that there was evidence in hand that he had survived. "I was misled," he says. "I was lied to. There are people whose heads should roll for lying to Congress, lying to me. But this isn't about me. The issue is let's bring him home, let's get the answers." Information leaked to Smith from classified reports about the crash site indicate that Speicher did indeed survive the crash and had been able to leave the scene under his own power; indications were also strong that the site had been previouosly studied.
- In 1996, Congress was partially briefed on the Speicher case, with just enough information to support another Navy claim that Speicher died in the crash. When the case was closed again, Smith, and later Roberts, began pressing to have Speicher's status changed from "KIA" to "MIA." The Pentagon began tarring Smith as a "troublemaker." Smith now says, "The intelligence community trashed me" for poking around the Speicher case. ...They told me it was 'unfortunate' and asked what 'relevance' is it that he is alive or not? What relevance?! America should not give up. We should leave no soldier behind. Period! We should do our best whether he is dead or alive." After a December 1997 New York Times article about the Speicher case, Republican Senator Richard Shelby opened a probe into the entire case, ordering the CIA to release sensitive files to his Select Committee on Intelligence. While the probe was underway, in 1999 an Iraqi defector told the committee that in 1991 he had driven Speicher from the crash site to a hospital. His story was verified. On January 11, 2001, Speicher was reclassified as missing in action. Then-president Clinton issued the following statement: "We have some information that leads us to believe he might be alive. And we hope and pray that he is. But we have already begun working to try to determine whether in fact he's alive; if he is, where he is; and how we can get him out. ...All I want to say is we have evidence which convinced me that we can't ensure that he perished. I don't want to hold out false hope, but I thought it was wrong to continue to classify him as killed in action when he might not have been." Both the CIA and DIA have British intelligence reports indicating that Speicher may be held in a prison where he is regularly visited by Iraqi intelligence, though Britain denies the report.
- Is Speicher still alive? Possibly, but Professor Miller doubts it. Instead, he and others believe the current Bush administration is using the Speicher case to gain sympathy for an invasion of Iraq. "I fully understand the emotional desire by Speicher's comrades and loved ones to find him if he's alive," Miller says. "But I still don't think there is any reason he survived that encounter. Why is all this coming up 10 years after the fact? You have to be naïve to think it is unrelated to the large, ambitious, war drive that the government is now carrying out for a new invasion of Iraq." Roberts reacts violently to the charge, snapping, "That's bullsh*t. Those charges are really out of line. They better not say that to my face." Miller responds, "I'm not saying it isn't true. Truth can be used as propaganda." (Insight Magazine)
- May 28: NATO and Russia sign a broad agreement pledging cooperation in fighting terrorism and preventing weapons of mass destruction from finding their way into terrorist hands. (NATO and UN History)
- May 30: Afghanistan's interim leader, Hamid Karzai, Turkmenistan's President Niyazov, and Pakistani President Musharraf meet in Islamabad to sign a memorandum of understanding on the trans-Afghanistan gas pipeline project. The three leaders will meet for more talks on the project in October. (NewsBase/From the Wilderness, CCR)
- May 30: An Alternet profile of John Bolton, Under Secretary of State for Disarmament Affairs and International Security, reveals a great deal about one of the main neoconservative hawks responsible for the current administration's foreign policy and, in 2005, the Bush nominee for the US's ambassador to the United Nations. Bolton, a protege of former GOP senator Jesse Helms, is widely known for his contempt for the UN and for other countries in general. "[T]here is no such thing as the United Nations," he said in 1994, while vice president at the American Enterprise Institute, "if the UN Secretariat building in New York lost 10 stories, it wouldn't make a bit of difference." (Bolton's hatred of the UN didn't stop him from pocketing $30,000 from Taiwan to advise them on becoming a member of that body.) Bolton was brought in to the State Department fresh from helping the Bush election campaign block the recount of votes in Florida, and foisted on Secretary Colin Powell, who holds much different beliefs about the US role in the world than Bolton; while Powell seems to think that treaties and allies should be taken seriously, Bolton subscribes to the Bush doctrine. The US should "recognize obligations only when it's in our interest," he says. He told a conference that in international operations there are simply "political obligations," presumably to be ignored when inexpedient. And as for allies, he declared that "the Europeans can be sure that America's days as a well-bred doormat for EU political and military protections are coming to an end." Senator Byron Dorgan, who vigorously opposed Bolton's nomination, made a remarkably prescient statement at his confirmation hearing: "To nominate Mr. John Bolton to be Under Secretary of State for Arms Control defies logic. The answer from the President, it seems to me, in sending this nomination to the Senate is no; we don't intend to lead on anything. We intend to do our own thing notwithstanding what anybody else thinks about it, and notwithstanding the consequences."
- Bolton is an active proponent of Star Wars, and when the Senate voted not to ratify the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), he gloated "CTBT is dead." And although polls show that more nearly 80 percent of Americans support a ban on all underground tests, Bolton mocked supporters of the test-ban treaty as "misguided individuals following a timid and neo-pacifist line of thought." In an interview with Arms Control magazine after taking office, Bolton caused a stir by seeming to back off the "no first use" policy of that has been the underpinning of the non-proliferation nuclear treaty. He is an active proponent of overthrowing Saddam Hussein, and has had the CIA investigate Hans Blix, the former head of the Atomic Agency who is now head of UNMOVIC, the UN weapons inspection team. He was reportedly very angry when the agency could find no evidence of backsliding by Blix. Bolton led a successful three-month battle to overthrow Jose Bustani, the newly re-elected head of Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, who was deposed in April for trying to get Iraq to sign the Convention on Chemical Weapons. Bolton is widely regarded as a unilateralist and a proponent of the PNAC's "Pax Americana" plan for global economic and military domination. (Alternet)
- May 31: FBI Agent Robert Wright holds a press conference describing his lawsuit against the FBI for deliberately curtailing investigations that might have prevented the 9-11 attacks. He uses words like "prevented," "thwarted," "obstructed," "threatened," "intimidated," and "retaliation" to describe the actions of his superiors in blocking his attempts to shut off money flows to al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups. (C-SPAN/From the Wilderness, CCR)
- Late May: Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill returns from a ten-day trip to West Africa, accompanied by, among others, U2's Bono, who surprises O'Neill with his knowledge and level of commitment towards bringing help to the poverty-stricken, water-starved, and AIDS-ravaged region. O'Neill comes back afire with ideas for helping the people in the region by helping them build simple, cost-effective water- and electricity-production facilities. O'Neill believes the modest sum of $25 million would begin to work wonders in the area he visited, as a start, and would go far to convince the world that the US, regarded as stingy and uncaring about such issues since Bush took office in January 2001, actually would extend help where needed. A further visit by O'Neill and others to Central Africa further energizes O'Neill. But O'Neill has offended senior White House officials by speaking "off-message" to reporters about what, specifically, the US could and should do for the region's inhabitants. He holds a meeting with national security advisor Condoleezza Rice, who is noncommital, and another with Secretary of State Colin Powell, who laughingly tells O'Neill, "You can certainly stir things up, just like always...." The Washington Post alarms the White House by writing of O'Neill's Africa trip, "O'Neill is using words that could haunt the administration if not followed by action, vowing that problems such as the lack of clean water will be addressed promptly." Meanwhile, O'Neill's statements are treated with caution by aid and development groups such as Oxfam and the World Bank, who have decades of experience in the blighted areas of Africa, saying that the water issues are more complex than O'Neill realizes, but O'Neill regards much of these cautionary remarks as little more than "excuses" for inaction.
- O'Neill requests a meeting on the matter with Bush. Instead of getting support, he receives a memo telling him to be careful what information he "leaks" to the press about his ideas, and to not even send documentation to Bush himself -- not just because of the potential that the information will find its way into the hands of the press and "upset the adminstration's legislative strategies," but, as O'Neill knows even though the memo does not say so, that Bush will not bother to read it. Such memos advising "discretion" are not new to O'Neill; the year before, he had snarled to his chief of staff, Michele Davis, "I'll be g*ddamned if I'm going to stop writing memos to the president because some b*stard at the White House is trying to leak me into extinction. ...[Bush] should have the opportunity to see coherent thoughts on paper" even if he chose not to read any of them. On June 10, O'Neill attends a conference with Bush and several other officials; Bush greets him by saying, without smiling, "You know something? You're getting quite a reputation as a truth-teller. You've got yourself a real cult following, don't ya?" O'Neill's ideas get no serious discussion, and he realizes that his days in the administration are numbered.
- During a June 12 one-on-one meeting with Bush, O'Neill launches directly into a plea for $25 million to be allocated to pilot projects for clean water provisions in Ghana that would "demonstrat[e] our values as Americans, and our ingenuity, and that this can be done for a reasonable cost and it can be done fast. You don't have to leave another generation to the vagaries of whether it rains or not, for Christ's sake!" Bush looks bored with the entire subject, and stares blankly at -- or through -- O'Neill. Bush is similarly uninterested in any projects to combat AIDS in Africa.
- Bush does show some interest in O'Neill's last proposal, for an economic conference to discuss Bush's tax cut policies. O'Neill tells Bush of the conference he organized in 1974 for the Ford administration, which brought labor leaders, economists, and CEOs with competing viewpoints together and, with TV cameras running, had them discuss broad fiscal and economic policy. He lauds Ford's input at the conference, saying he was "attentive and really knowledgeable about all competing positions and how able and insightful and grounded he was in solving the nation's problems.... [T]o see a president, with complete mastery of the issues, looking for solutions, is the key." Bush thinks for a moment and says, "I think I can do that." (Ron Suskind)
- Late May: The revelation that Bush had been warned of the likelihood of an al-Qaeda attack in his August 6, 2001 daily briefing breaks, for a moment, what columnist and author Frank Rich calls the "bipartisan honeymoon" in Washington. House Minority Leader Richard Gephardt demands more information about what the White House knew in the weeks and months before the attacks and when the White House knew it. He is joined by other lawmakers, including Republican senator Richard Shelby. They are promptly smeared as unpatriotic by Dick Cheney, who calls any suggestions that the White House had any advance warning of imminent attacks "incendiary," and says to even ask such questions is "thoroughly irresponsible and totally unworthy of national leaders in a time of war." Cheney's brayings do not stop the revelations of pre-9/11 failures from continuing to come out. (Frank Rich pp.47-8)